Close the Complaint Loop!


 

HIX Accreditation Timetables


 

Posted February 15, 2012

Health Plan, Version 7.1 P-RPT 2 - Reporting to URAC on Exploratory (Leading) Measures


The Basics

This standard allows your organization to choose to report on any or all of the exploratory measures. Those measures are:

  • Case Management: Contacting Consumers
  • Complaint Response Timeliness
  • Outpatient Newborn Visit Within One Month of Birth
  • Diabetes: All or None Process Measure: Optimal Results for HbA1c, LDL-C, and BP

Management Tips

While not required, these optional standards give your organization a glimpse into what is involved in conducting measures that may someday be a part of the array of mandatory measurements. 

URAC Accreditation Tips

This standard is a Leading Indicator.

At the desktop review stage, you'll need to submit only a summary description of your current and/or future ability to report on the optional measures. Be sure your description includes the resources and mechanisms you'll need to conduct the required measurements. 

The onsite review activity for this standard is a conversation between the reviewer and the person(s) in charge of the measurement program.

Health Plan, Version 7.1 P-RPT 1 - Reporting to URAC on Mandatory Measures


The Basics

This standard simply requires that your organization report on all 14 of the mandatory measures. They are intended not only to provide a plan with valuable tools for quality improvement, they eventually will be reported to the public.

The mandatory measures are:

  • Proportion of Days Covered
  • Number of Specialists Accepting New Patients At End of Reporting Period by Specialist Type
  • Dyslipidemia New Medication 12-Week Lipid Test
  • Drug-Drug interactions
  • Diabetes Short-Term Complications Event Rate
  • Diabetes Long-Term Complications Event Rate
  • Adult Asthma Event Rate
  • Pediatric Asthma Event Rate
  • Atherosclerotic Disease -- Lipid Panel Monitoring
  • Diabetes: All or None Process Measure (Optimal Testing: HbA1c, LDL-C, nephropathy)
  • Number of PCPs accepting new patients at end of reporting period by PCP type
  • Medication Therapy for Persons with Asthma: Submoptimal Asthma Control (SAC) and Absence of Controller Therapy (ACT)
  • Call Center Performance
  • CAHPS Adult Health Plan Survey

Your organization must start collecting data for measures during the calendar year after the first URAC accreditation under these standards. So, Plans receiving accreditation in 2013 must collect data in 2014 to provide to URAC in 2015.

For the last six measures HP-9 through HP-14, your organization may request of the URAC Measures Advisory Group ("MAG") a reporting waiver in lieu of providing the URAC measure. The MAG will approve or reject such a proposal at its discretion.

Management Tips

The first step will be to assess your organization's readiness to conduct the required measurements. Start this process early, so that you have time not only to develop measurement methodologies, but also to request a waiver if you need or desire to do so. 

URAC Accreditation Tips

This standard is mandatory.

At the desktop review stage, you'll need to submit only a summary description of your current and/or future ability to report on all the required measures. Be sure your description includes the resources and mechanisms you'll need to conduct the required measurements. If you are going to request approval of equivalent mandatory measures, you need to submit such a request at this stage of the process, too. Your request needs to be accompanied by a detailed justification for your request.

The onsite review activity for this standard is a conversation between the reviewer and the person(s) in charge of the measurement program.

Health Plan, Version 7.1 P-CP 1 - Compliance Program: Internal Controls


 

The Basics

This standard establishes these requirements for your organization's compliance program:

  • A compliance officer, whose duties are outlined in the compliance program description;
  • Periodic review, updating, and approval of the training and education aspect of the compliance program, which review should be documented in some form, such as meeting minutes;
  • Periodic, documented review to determine if any internal organizational changes, such as P&Ps, benefits, or protocols, have compliance implications;
  • Ongoing communication with delegates about compliance issues;
  • A thorough, documented review of applicable state and federal laws, including privacy and security, mental health, and fraud, waste, and abuse. This review should be conducted by an appropriate oversight body described in the program description. 

Management Tips

We advise our clients to have a comprehensive compliance program description. Our recommended minimum components of that description are as follows:

Compliance Program Outline

I. Governance

A. Compliance Officer(s)

B. Accountabilities/Reporting Structure

1. Administrative structure

2. Compliance Committee (if any)

3. Oversight of the compliance program by governing body

C. Reports

II. Tracking of Laws, Regulations, Administrative Rules, and Accreditation Standards

A. Process for assessing existing matrix of laws, regulations, rules, and standards

B. Process for updating compliance matrix with changes to laws, regulations, rules, and standards

III. Implementation of Compliance Program

A. Process for translating external standards into organizational policies and procedures

B. Training of governing body, employees, and agents in compliance program

C. Procedures for detecting non-compliant conduct by employees and agents

1. Audit and other monitoring mechanisms

2. Reporting mechanisms

D. Disciplinary mechanisms for non-compliant conduct by employees and agents

E. Post hoc analyses of instances of misconduct to determine whether a systemic change is suggested by the problem

F. Systems for assuring that both hiring and compensation practices encourage the creation and maintenance of a compliant work force

IV. Promotion of an organizational culture to encourage ethical conduct and a commitment to compliance with the law

V. Periodic evaluation of compliance program

A. Evaluation of training

B. Evaluation of organization P&Ps, protocols, etc.

URAC Accreditation Tips

Three of the elements of this standard relating to the review of state and federal laws and regulations are all mandatory; the remaining standards vary in weight between 2 and 4.

The desktop submission should include your Compliance Program Description and/or your comprehensive compliance P&Ps, as well as your compliance officer's job description. In addition, submit documentation of review and approval of the compliance program description by the appropriate oversight body, as well as sample compliance training materials.

Health Plan, Version 7.1 P-HCH 3 - Plan Evaluation of PCHCH


 

The Basics

This standard imposes a requirement that your organization measure the success of your PCHCH program. That evaluation must be based in part on input from providers and members, and be submitted at least annually to the QM Committee.

Management Tips

Your organization has flexibility around how to measure "success", but it must be quantifiable. Make sure the evaluation process is described in your program description or PCHCH P&Ps. 

URAC Accreditation Tips

The three elements of this standard are weighted either 3 or 4.

At the desktop review phase, the full complement of PCHCH policies and program description. In addition, submit the most recent report of the program.

The onsite reviewer will want to see documentation of the report of your evaluation of the PCHCH program to the QM Committee, including evidence of that report in the meeting minutes.

 

Health Plan, Version 7.1 P-HCH 2 - Plan Promotion of PCHCH


 

The Basics

This standard describes the promotional requirements of your PCHCH program. Those requirements include the transparent communication of any incentives in the program to either providers or members. Incentives are not required, however, you must describe them if they exist. In addition, your organization must evaluate the effectiveness of your communications program and timely communicate to the affected parties any changes in the program's incentives.

Management Tips

Be sure your PCHCH P&Ps or program description describes in some detail your communications about the program, including modes of communication. Those modes must be designed to reach the a widespread audience. You have some flexibility in selection of modes, but URAC will have an expectation that you use multiple modalities. Be sure to include time frames for communication and evaluation of that communication in your documentation. Note, however, that those time frames must be met, and the failure to do so may be a violation of the requirements of Core 3(a).

URAC Accreditation Tips

The three elements of this standard are weighted either 3 or 4.

At the desktop review phase, submit samples of your communications to providers and members about your PCHCH program. In addition, submit the full complement of PCHCH policies and program description.

The onsite reviewer will want to see documentation of your evaluation of the PCHCH communications efforts, as well as sample notification to members and providers of changes in program incentives.

 

Health Plan, Version 7.1 P-HCH 1 - PCHCH Initiative or Program Requirements


 

The Basics

 

This standard, and the other two HCH standards, is applicable only if your organization seeks a designation as a Patient Centered Health Care Home ("PCHCH") in conjunction with its accreditation.

The standard requires your organization to have a written description of your PCHCH. That document must:

  • Define PHCHC
  • Include the principles underlying the definition
  • Describe the PHCHCH Goals and expectations
  • The scope of the program, including type of care delivery sites and a description of the areas of focus, if the program is targeted
  • Define your measures of the program's effectiveness
  • Be reviewed and approved annually by the appropriate oversight authority

Management Tips

The oversight body that approves the program annually must be "a body comprised of discipline-specific experts such as physicians, pharmacists, providers, and content experts who may include non-physician providers such as certified health educators, respiratory therapists, nutritionists, nurses, mental health professionals, or other specialists." 

Possible targets for your program might be any of a number of clinical specialty areas, including pediatrics, geriatrics, or particular categories of treatment, like behavioral health.

 

URAC Accreditation Tips

 

The six elements of the standard are each weighted 2.

Submit your written description of the PCHCH at the desktop review stage.

The onsite reviewer will interview the staff supporting the PCHCH oversight body and review minutes of that oversight body's meetings at which the program description was approved by that body.

Health Plan, Version 7.1 P-OPS 12 - Breach Handling


The Basics

This standard, based on the requirements of HIPAA, establishes specific, mandatory components of your approach when you learn of a potential breach. The federal government's web site has a lengthy explanation of "breach":

"A breach is, generally, an impermissible use or disclosure under the Privacy Rule that compromises the security or privacy of the protected health information such that the use or disclosure poses a significant risk of financial, reputational, or other harm to the affected individual."

The site goes on to list three exceptions to this definition:

  • the unintentional acquisition, access, or use of protected health information by a workforce member acting under the authority of a covered entity or business associate;
  • the inadvertent disclosure of protected health information from a person authorized to access protected health information at a covered entity or business associate to another person authorized to access protected health information at the covered entity or business associate; and
  • if the covered entity or business associate has a good faith belief that the unauthorized individual, to whom the impermissible disclosure was made, would not have been able to retain the information.

URAC's characterization of the HIPAA requirements in the event of a breach are that you must:

  • record the date your organization became aware of the breach;
  • notify the privacy and security officials;
  • assess whether, in fact, a breach occurred.

Then, if you find out that a breach has occurred, your health plan must:

  • mitigate the breach's cause;
  • if you are acting as a business associate, notify your covered entity within 3 business days;
  • notify the affected individuals in a manner compliant with HIPAA;
  • notify HHS, as required; and
  • conduct an analysis of specific aspects of the breach and perform appropriate remediation.

Management Tips

If your P&Ps are compliant with HIPAA, it is almost certain they are compliant with this standard. You may use this standard as an audit tool to double-check compliance.

You may be puzzled by the "business associate" reference. Yes, URAC knows that, as a health plan, your organization likely is a covered entity. It also knows, however, that it is possible for an organization to be  a covered entity and still act as a business associate. 

URAC Accreditation Tips

All eight elements of this standard are mandatory.

All you need to submit for desktop review are the applicable P&Ps. 

The onsite review, however, is more elaborate for this standard. The reviewer will want to examine your breach events log, as well as any documentation of follow up actions to a breach. In addition, the reviewer will interview the senior clinician, compliance and privacy officers, and staff and supervisors in customer services, UM, and QM.

Health Plan, Version 7.1 P-OPS 11 - Oversight of Automated Review of Pharmacy Non-Certifications


The Basics

If your organization conducts automated review in connection with drug management, you must have written P&Ps that describe the oversight mechanism for such automated review. That oversight must be conducted by both a senior clinician and a clinical oversight body. That oversight body can be, but need not be, the P&T Committee.

The oversight of automated review must be active and well-documented. Of particular importance is the examination of the relationship between automated review and the appeals process. The evaluation of the automated review process and the linkages to appeals must be conducted no less frequently than annually in order to be considered active and meaningful.

Management Tips

Your P&P on this topic should spell out oversight responsibilities quite clearly. Make sure you address linkages to appeals; it will not be sufficient to show mere oversight of the automated review mechanism. 

URAC Accreditation Tips

This standard has two mandatory elements. (It looks like it has three, but since two are alternate to each other, it's really only two.)

You'll want to submit quite a bit of documentation for desktop review. In addition to the relevant P&Ps, you'll want a thorough description of the methodology by which the senior clinician and clinical oversight body evaluate automated review and appeals linkages. In addition, submit a job description for the senior clinician who oversees the review and linkages. Make sure that job description includes this function. Finally, submit minutes of the clinical oversight body demonstrating that it has, in fact, implemented the oversight required by this standard.

The onsite review will consist of interviews of the clinical staff person conducting the oversight and the staff members supporting the P&T Committee. In addition, the reviewer will want to see documentation of the annual evaluation.