Core 4.0

C-PMI 1-3: Quality Management Program Implementation

Submited by: Tom Goddard

The Basics

This standard puts the meat on URAC's QM requirements, mandating that your program include:

  • selection and definition of performance indicators and how each is to be measured under what time frames;
  • valid and accurate measurement of processes and/or events such as errors, satisfaction (of consumers if you serve consumers directly, or clients being served); complaints (again, consumers if you are consumer-facing, and/or clients), access to your services; or outcome trends;
  • analysis of these measurements to assess whether your organization are meeting its quantifiable goals in these areas;
  • interventions designed to improve performance or correct problems, in order to meet organizational performance objectives; 
  • evaluation of the effectiveness of the implemented interventions, including barrier analysis if goals remain unmet;
  • revision of interventions in response to the evaluation of intervention effectiveness; and
  • periodic re-measurement of performance measures for as long as the organization deems such measurement appropriate.

Management Tips

While URAC doesn't specify this in the text of the standard, it is clear that these activities are at the heart of the QMC's business. It should be overseeing a comprehensive program of performance improvement that includes specific, valid measurement, interpretation of those measurements, and the design and implementation of an ongoing series of interventions to improve quality and reduce error. The QM program description should outline these activities clearly, and the QMC meeting minutes should document their implementation. 
What do you compare your performance to? It could be that your first measurement establishes the baseline, or perhaps there are national or regional measurements that serve as a good baseline.

Accreditation Tips

Desktop Review
Submit your QM program description, your QM dashboard, staff QM reports to the QMC, and/or QMC meeting minutes demonstrating compliance with all the elements of this standard. In addition, submit documentation that demonstrates the QM activities you have undertaken when your performance does not meet your goals as stated in your performance metrics.
Validation Review
Interviews
The reviewer May interview both staff and leadership about your total QM program activities.
Document reviews
The reviewer will focus on QMC meeting minutes. Be sure those minutes include all reports that would be supportive of a demonstration of compliance with this standard.

  • Core 3.4 / 06.29.2020

    CORE 40 - Health Literacy

    This standard, a new, experimental standard, suggests that your organization should have policies and procedures that address health literacy. In this context, the meaning of health literacy is, "The degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate decisions regarding their health." The three suggested...

    READ FULL POST
  • Core 3.4 / 06.29.2020

    CORE 39 - Consumer Satisfaction

    This short standard requires that your organization have a mechanism to collect information about your consumers' satisfaction.This often is done in the form of customer satisfaction surveys, consumer complaints, and sometimes even focus groups. Find out what your organization does -- it's likely more than one mechanism.

    READ FULL POST
  • Core 3.4 / 06.29.2020

    CORE 38 - Consumer Safety Mechanism

    One of the most important of the URAC standards is this one, which requires that the organization have processes to respond quickly to urgent situations that threaten consumers' well-being.Even though the standard speaks of "a mechanism", the reality is that it requires a system of mechanisms dealing with the full array of urgent situations that are likely to confront the applicant. You can see th...

    READ FULL POST
Top