Dental Plan with Health Insurance Marketplace (HIM) 7.2

DPHIM-CR 17 - Credentialing Delegation

Submited by: Tom Goddard

The Basics

Some organizations delegate credentialing to other organizations, like facilities, provider groups, or credentials verification organizations (the "CVOs"). URAC has four standards in the Core module that address delegation generally (Core 6-9).  
This standard establishes two requirements in addition to the requirements contained in those four standards. 

  • If your organization delegates credentialing to another organization, it must retain authority to make the final credentialing determination. Part of this process is likely to involve your organization comparing a list of approved providers forwarded from the delegate to add to your network against a historical list of providers previously terminated or denied in order to determine whether the providers are to added to your network.
  • In addition, no less frequently than three years, the organization must either
    • conduct surveys of its credentialing contractors, or
    • review randomly selected credentialing files.
Finally, the organization must provide the credentialing committee with an annual report on delegation oversight.  
The onsite surveys should be conducted according to your credentialing plan or a policy and procedure that directly addresses the performance of on-site surveys of delegated entities that conduct credentialing for your organization. Typically, a standardized audit form is used for such on-site audits. The on-site audit should involve a random sample of complete credentialing files that the contractor has administered on your organization' behalf. The sample size should be at least 10% of those files, but in no case fewer than 10 files nor more than 30 files.

Management Tips

Make sure that, if you take advantage of he option to conduct a review of randomly-selected credentialing files instead of conducting an onsite review, that your P&P specifies how long after the request the contractor has to provide the selected files.
Naturally, if your organization does not delegate credentialing, this standard is not applicable.

Accreditation Tips

Desktop Review
At the desktop review stage, you should submit your credentialing plan, a template delegation agreement, your on-site audit tool, sample credentialing committee meeting minutes in which the committee demonstrates that it retains final authority for credentialing decisions, and/or sample committee meeting minutes that document a decision to delegate or not to delegate credentialing to another entity.
If your organization does not delegate credentialing, submit an attestation to that affect, on organizational letterhead and signed by a senior executive.
Validation Review
Document review
The on-site reviewer will examine credentialing committee meeting minutes from the last four years. In addition, the reviewer will look at "delegation binders" for each of several of your contractors. Each delegation binder should contain the delegation agreement, reports submitted by the contractor, completed audit sheets from your on-site surveys, and documentation of other required oversight activity.
The reviewer also will talk with your credentialing staff about the delegation oversight process.

  • Core 4.0 / 06.20.2018

    C-RM 1-2: Policy Addressing Reporting of Violations

    This standard requires your organization’s compliance policies to:Protect individuals reporting violations of ethical, regulatory, or legal requirements;Address the consequences of failing to report violations; andProtect the confidentiality of anyone reporting violations.

  • Core 4.0 / 06.18.2018

    C-RM 1-1: Regulatory Compliance and Internal Controls

    This standard, which bears a strong resemblance to Core 4 in the previous versions of Core, describes the fundamental aspects of an effective compliance program:Tracking applicable laws and regulations. This is an ongoing process of tracking existing laws and regulations and keeping up with changes in those laws and regulations. So, you need to identify -- in a clear and specific policy and proced...

  • Core 4.0 / 06.18.2018

    C-CPE 2-3: Monitoring and Oversight of Ethical Healthcare Practices

    Once an organization has defined ethical practices, as required by the previous standard, it must implement mechanisms to monitor for violations of its ethical standards and address those violations. Such mechanisms must spell out how it:Identifies appropriate authorities to remediate particular situations involving ethical transgressions;Will take action in the event of ethical issues; andWill re...