Independent Review Organization: Internal Review 5.0

IR-INT 3 - Credential Status Changes

Submited by: Tom Goddard

The Basics

This standard requires that the IRO have and implement policies and procedures that both

  1. require the IRO's staff members to notify the IRO in the event there is an adverse change in the status of the staffer's license or certification (including board certification) and
  2. provide a procedure to implement a corrective action plan in the event of such an adverse change.

In other words, if a member of the IRO's staff should have licensure or certification either downgraded or pulled, the staffer must notify the IRO and the IRO must take prompt and appropriate action, such as re-assigning the staff member to an assignment that doesn't require licensure and/or certification.

Management Tips

As is the case with all policies and procedures, make sure that yours are sufficiently clear to guide all the involved staff members on each step in both the reporting process and the development and implementation of the corrective action plan. It will not suffice to describe what the organization will do; rather, your team members need to be able to follow the directions provided in the P&P.

Accreditation Tips

Desktop Review

All you will need to submit at the desktop review phase is the policy and procedure that addresses both elements of this standard. If you do have a form for the corrective action plan, submit that, too.

Validation Review

Document review

The reviewer will, as a part of the review of more than 30 files described in earlier standards, look for evidence of compliance or non-compliance with this standard. In other words, if the reviewer should find that a member of your staff that had a compromised license or certification worked on one or more of these files, the reviewer likely will find that the IRO has not complied with element (b) of this standard.

Interviews

The URAC reviewer will interview a variety of staff members, including those in charge of selecting reviewers and verifying reviewer credentials.

  • Core 4.0 Pre-release / 12.05.2018

    C-OPIN 4-1: Delegation Management

    This standard sets forth what appear to be simple requirements regarding how your organization manages the delegation process. In short, it says that if your organization delegates functions that are within the scope of your URAC accreditation, it retains accountability for compliance with URAC standards regarding those functions and conducts periodic oversight of the performance of the delegated...

    READ FULL POST
  • Core 4.0 Pre-release / 12.05.2018

    C-PMI 1-5: Quality Management Program Evaluation

    This standard both requires that your organization conduct an annual evaluation of the effectiveness of your QM program and describes the required components of that evaluation, which must be provided to the leadership at least annually. The required components include:Recommendations to leadership on how to improve the QM program;An analysis of the organization's performance as compared to the or...

    READ FULL POST
  • Core 4.0 Pre-release / 12.04.2018

    C-PMI 1-4: Data Management and Performance Reporting

    This standard focuses on the data side of the QM program. Your QM documentation needs to clearly identify:how you collect performance indicator data;how you analyze those data; andhow and to whom you report data.In addition, the performance indicators must be relevant to your organization's performance and must be quantifiable. You'll need to benchmark your performance on these performance indicat...

    READ FULL POST
Top