Independent Review Organization: Internal Review 5.0

IR-INT 4 - Reviewer Qualifications

Submited by: Tom Goddard

The Basics

Under this standard, the IRO must establish qualifications for its reviewers. At a minimum, those requirements must include the following:

  • Current, non-restricted license or certificate as required under U.S. law for clinical practice;
  • At least five years FTE experience with direct clinical care;
  • Must be a clinical peer (i.e., "a physician or other health professional who holds an unrestricted license and is in the same or similar specialty as typically manages the medical condition, procedures, or treatment under review"); and
  • Have a scope of licensure/certification/experience appropriate to the issue under review. 

Management Tips

The licensure/certification requirement is only for the minimum requirement for clinical practice, not board certification. Board certification is addressed in IR-INT 5.

"FTE" means between 37.5 or more hours per week.

When URAC talks about "clinical peer", it means that, generally, as a peer in a similar specialty, the individual must be in the same profession, i.e., the same licensure category as the ordering provider.

As you craft your policies, be sure to consider the circumstances under which multiple reviewers might be necessary in order to have a clear view of alternative therapies or treatments. 

Accreditation Tips

Desktop Review

A clearly written policy and procedure that outlines not only the criteria for reviewers but how reviewers' experience and licensure will be checked for compliance with those criteria will suffice at this stage of the accreditation process.

Validation Review

Document review

Also as a part of the 30-file review we've already discussed will be an assessment as to whether the peer reviewer for each of those cases meets the IRO's requirements for reviewers.


The requirements for this standard will be a part of the interviews of staff handling credentials verification, reviewer assignment, and of the two peer reviewers.

  • IRO Core 3.0 / 12.28.2017

    IRO CORE 38 - Consumer Safety Mechanism

    One of the most important of the URAC standards is this one, which requires that the organization have processes to respond quickly to urgent situations that threaten consumers' well-being.Even though the standard speaks of "a mechanism", the reality is that it requires a system of mechanisms dealing with the full array of urgent situations that are likely to confront the applicant. You can see th...

  • IRO Core 3.0 / 12.28.2017

    IRO CORE 33 - Financial Incentive Policy

    This standard says, essentially, that if the organization has a system by which people are provided financial incentives that are based directly on consumer utilization of healthcare services, there must be mechanisms in place to make sure that these incentives don't end up compromising consumer care. This policy includes capitation of providers. Not all URAC reviewers over the years have interp...

  • IRO Core 3.0 / 12.28.2017

    IRO CORE 32 - Senior Clinical Staff Responsibilities

    The senior clinician whose qualifications are set forth in Core 31 must, according to this standard, provide guidance and be responsible for all of the clinical aspects of the organization's program being accredited. In addition, the senior clinician must have periodic consultation with individuals in the field or licensed to deliver healthcare services without supervision, i.e. practitioners. F...