Health Network 7.1

N-CR 10 - Consumer Safety Credentialing Investigation

Submited by: Tom Goddard

The Basics

This extremely important standard requires that, if the credentialing process reveals information that indicates factors that may impact the quality of care or service provided to consumers, the organization conducts additional review and investigation of that provider.
Your organization's policy and procedure on this issue no doubt spells out the circumstances that should trigger further investigation. Such circumstances are likely to include information about malpractice litigation, missing information, or inconsistent information. What your policy probably provides for is closer examination of such files by a senior clinical staff person. It's also very likely that your policy and procedure requires that such files be discussed in detail by the credentialing committee.
It will be particularly important that you follow the policy and procedure regarding how you document any such follow-up activities. Documentation should be clear and detailed regarding what was done, who did it, and when the activity was conducted.

Management Tips

Your policy and procedure should be quite clear in providing guidance to credentialing staff members as to what should trigger further investigation. Your policy also should provide clear guidance as to who should conduct investigations, and whether senior clinical personnel should be involved. Finally, your policy should articulate explicitly how such a file should be presented to the credentialing committee.

Accreditation Tips

Desktop Review
During the desktop review process, you should submit not only your credentialing plan, but some sort of description of the roles of various staff members, clinical or otherwise, in handling the identification and investigation of "problem files". This documentation can come in the form of the credentialing plan, policies and procedures, or job descriptions.
Validation Review
Interviews
The URAC reviewer will conduct interviews with the senior clinical staff person and members of the credentialing staff.
Document Review
During the on-site review, the standard will be verified through a review of credentialing files in which such investigations took place.

  • IRO Core 3.0 / 12.28.2017

    IRO CORE 38 - Consumer Safety Mechanism

    One of the most important of the URAC standards is this one, which requires that the organization have processes to respond quickly to urgent situations that threaten consumers' well-being.Even though the standard speaks of "a mechanism", the reality is that it requires a system of mechanisms dealing with the full array of urgent situations that are likely to confront the applicant. You can see th...

    READ FULL POST
  • IRO Core 3.0 / 12.28.2017

    IRO CORE 33 - Financial Incentive Policy

    This standard says, essentially, that if the organization has a system by which people are provided financial incentives that are based directly on consumer utilization of healthcare services, there must be mechanisms in place to make sure that these incentives don't end up compromising consumer care. This policy includes capitation of providers. Not all URAC reviewers over the years have interp...

    READ FULL POST
  • IRO Core 3.0 / 12.28.2017

    IRO CORE 32 - Senior Clinical Staff Responsibilities

    The senior clinician whose qualifications are set forth in Core 31 must, according to this standard, provide guidance and be responsible for all of the clinical aspects of the organization's program being accredited. In addition, the senior clinician must have periodic consultation with individuals in the field or licensed to deliver healthcare services without supervision, i.e. practitioners. F...

    READ FULL POST
Top