Health Network 7.1

N-CR 10 - Consumer Safety Credentialing Investigation

Submited by: Tom Goddard

The Basics

This extremely important standard requires that, if the credentialing process reveals information that indicates factors that may impact the quality of care or service provided to consumers, the organization conducts additional review and investigation of that provider.
Your organization's policy and procedure on this issue no doubt spells out the circumstances that should trigger further investigation. Such circumstances are likely to include information about malpractice litigation, missing information, or inconsistent information. What your policy probably provides for is closer examination of such files by a senior clinical staff person. It's also very likely that your policy and procedure requires that such files be discussed in detail by the credentialing committee.
It will be particularly important that you follow the policy and procedure regarding how you document any such follow-up activities. Documentation should be clear and detailed regarding what was done, who did it, and when the activity was conducted.

Management Tips

Your policy and procedure should be quite clear in providing guidance to credentialing staff members as to what should trigger further investigation. Your policy also should provide clear guidance as to who should conduct investigations, and whether senior clinical personnel should be involved. Finally, your policy should articulate explicitly how such a file should be presented to the credentialing committee.

Accreditation Tips

Desktop Review
During the desktop review process, you should submit not only your credentialing plan, but some sort of description of the roles of various staff members, clinical or otherwise, in handling the identification and investigation of "problem files". This documentation can come in the form of the credentialing plan, policies and procedures, or job descriptions.
Validation Review
Interviews
The URAC reviewer will conduct interviews with the senior clinical staff person and members of the credentialing staff.
Document Review
During the on-site review, the standard will be verified through a review of credentialing files in which such investigations took place.

  • Dental Plan with Health Insurance Marketplace (HIM) 7.2 / 10.17.2017

    DPHIM-NM 13 - Participating Provider Violation Mechanism

    The standard requires that your organization implement a means of addressing alleged violations by participating providers in its network of the organization's requirements for providers. The standard applies only to providers already in your network, not merely applicants for participation in the network. 

    READ FULL POST
  • Dental Plan with Health Insurance Marketplace (HIM) 7.2 / 10.17.2017

    DPHIM-NM 12 - Provider Network Disclosures

    The standard is intended to address the situation of "silent PPOs".  URAC provides the following definition and explanation of silent PPOs:[A] PPO brokers access to its provider network to other PPOs or payers without providers’ knowledge. For example, PPO X may sell access to its provider network to PPO Y. When an eligible person from PPO Y receives service from a physician in PPO X’s network, PP...

    READ FULL POST
  • Dental Plan with Health Insurance Marketplace (HIM) 7.2 / 10.17.2017

    DPHIM-NM 11 - Other Participating Provider Agreement Documentation

    This standard contemplates that not all of your existing contracts with participating providers contain all of the requirements of the previous several standards. Rather than forcing your organization to go back and amend all of the extant, noncompliant participating provider agreements, URAC allows you to "fix" to these agreements by using your provider manual or other similar document that descr...

    READ FULL POST
Top