Health Network 7.1

N-CR 11 - Credentialing Application Review

Submited by: Tom Goddard

The Basics

This standard requires that, before a provider is designated as a participating provider and included in the provider directory, your organization first review the application and approve that application.
There are two ways you organization may approve an application to become a participating provider. First, your credentialing committee could vote to approve it. Second, if it is a "clean" application, your senior clinical staff person may approve the application.
There is one exception to this requirement, that is, if, for clinical reasons, there is a compelling reason to grant "provisional" dissipation to a provider, your senior clinical staff person may grant such an approval. This usually comes up in connection with the need to provide continuity of care to a patient. In such a case, your organization should move that provider's credentialing process forward as quickly as possible.

Management Tips

Among the most important things to assure as a manager of the provider credentialing process is that no providers end up in the provider directory who have not been through your organization's credentialing process. It is difficult to imagine an organization receiving full accreditation if it allows providers who have not been through the credentialing process to be listed in the provider directory.
The reviewer is looking in your credentialing plan for an explanation that, once a file is approved, credentialing triggers the provider to an active status. That action may inform the contracting department to add the provider to the directory or, simply to change the status so that such activities can occur to activate the provider. In addition, many credentialing plans or policies begin with language that state no provider can be activated in the organization until he/she has completed the credentialing process and therefore has been approved to participate in the network.

Accreditation Tips

Desktop Review
Submit the credentialing plan, which should be explicit in providing that no provider shall be considered to be a participating provider who has not gone through the credentialing process.
Validation Review
interviews
The on-site review will focus on interviews with clinical leadership and credentialing staff.
Document Review
The URAC reviewer will conduct a review of credentialing committee meeting minutes over the last four years.

  • Dental Plan with Health Insurance Marketplace (HIM) 7.2 / 10.17.2017

    DPHIM-NM 13 - Participating Provider Violation Mechanism

    The standard requires that your organization implement a means of addressing alleged violations by participating providers in its network of the organization's requirements for providers. The standard applies only to providers already in your network, not merely applicants for participation in the network. 

    READ FULL POST
  • Dental Plan with Health Insurance Marketplace (HIM) 7.2 / 10.17.2017

    DPHIM-NM 12 - Provider Network Disclosures

    The standard is intended to address the situation of "silent PPOs".  URAC provides the following definition and explanation of silent PPOs:[A] PPO brokers access to its provider network to other PPOs or payers without providers’ knowledge. For example, PPO X may sell access to its provider network to PPO Y. When an eligible person from PPO Y receives service from a physician in PPO X’s network, PP...

    READ FULL POST
  • Dental Plan with Health Insurance Marketplace (HIM) 7.2 / 10.17.2017

    DPHIM-NM 11 - Other Participating Provider Agreement Documentation

    This standard contemplates that not all of your existing contracts with participating providers contain all of the requirements of the previous several standards. Rather than forcing your organization to go back and amend all of the extant, noncompliant participating provider agreements, URAC allows you to "fix" to these agreements by using your provider manual or other similar document that descr...

    READ FULL POST
Top