Health Network 7.1

N-CR 11 - Credentialing Application Review

Submited by: Tom Goddard

The Basics

This standard requires that, before a provider is designated as a participating provider and included in the provider directory, your organization first review the application and approve that application.
There are two ways you organization may approve an application to become a participating provider. First, your credentialing committee could vote to approve it. Second, if it is a "clean" application, your senior clinical staff person may approve the application.
There is one exception to this requirement, that is, if, for clinical reasons, there is a compelling reason to grant "provisional" dissipation to a provider, your senior clinical staff person may grant such an approval. This usually comes up in connection with the need to provide continuity of care to a patient. In such a case, your organization should move that provider's credentialing process forward as quickly as possible.

Management Tips

Among the most important things to assure as a manager of the provider credentialing process is that no providers end up in the provider directory who have not been through your organization's credentialing process. It is difficult to imagine an organization receiving full accreditation if it allows providers who have not been through the credentialing process to be listed in the provider directory.
The reviewer is looking in your credentialing plan for an explanation that, once a file is approved, credentialing triggers the provider to an active status. That action may inform the contracting department to add the provider to the directory or, simply to change the status so that such activities can occur to activate the provider. In addition, many credentialing plans or policies begin with language that state no provider can be activated in the organization until he/she has completed the credentialing process and therefore has been approved to participate in the network.

Accreditation Tips

Desktop Review
Submit the credentialing plan, which should be explicit in providing that no provider shall be considered to be a participating provider who has not gone through the credentialing process.
Validation Review
The on-site review will focus on interviews with clinical leadership and credentialing staff.
Document Review
The URAC reviewer will conduct a review of credentialing committee meeting minutes over the last four years.

  • IRO Core 3.0 / 12.28.2017

    IRO CORE 38 - Consumer Safety Mechanism

    One of the most important of the URAC standards is this one, which requires that the organization have processes to respond quickly to urgent situations that threaten consumers' well-being.Even though the standard speaks of "a mechanism", the reality is that it requires a system of mechanisms dealing with the full array of urgent situations that are likely to confront the applicant. You can see th...

  • IRO Core 3.0 / 12.28.2017

    IRO CORE 33 - Financial Incentive Policy

    This standard says, essentially, that if the organization has a system by which people are provided financial incentives that are based directly on consumer utilization of healthcare services, there must be mechanisms in place to make sure that these incentives don't end up compromising consumer care. This policy includes capitation of providers. Not all URAC reviewers over the years have interp...

  • IRO Core 3.0 / 12.28.2017

    IRO CORE 32 - Senior Clinical Staff Responsibilities

    The senior clinician whose qualifications are set forth in Core 31 must, according to this standard, provide guidance and be responsible for all of the clinical aspects of the organization's program being accredited. In addition, the senior clinician must have periodic consultation with individuals in the field or licensed to deliver healthcare services without supervision, i.e. practitioners. F...