Health Network 7.1

N-NM 17 - Participating Provider Suspension Mechanism for Consumer Safety

Submited by: Tom Goddard

The Basics

The standard is for the special situation of a provider whose conduct is so egregious as to give rise to a well-founded concern by your medical director that the provider is posing a threat to the well-being of your members. This is a very important consumer safety standard. Not only must your medical director be freed from the requirement of taking such a dispute through the normal, often slow, dispute resolution process, it places an affirmative requirement on him or her to handle such a situation in an expeditious manner.
The proper procedure, once the medical director concludes that the provider poses such a danger, is to suspend immediately the provider. Then, after the suspension, your organization should conduct an expedited investigation to make sure that the medical director's concerns were well-founded. Finally, the dispute resolution mechanism described in the previous standards must be made available to the suspended provider.

Management Tips

The requirements of this standard must be embodied in your credentialing plan or a policy and procedure that explicitly contemplates this circumstance. In addition, your medical director must be absolutely clear that he or she not only has this authority, but also an affirmative obligation to exercise this authority.

Accreditation Tips

Desktop Review
For the desktop review phase, you may submit the same documentation that you submit for the previous dispute resolution standards.  
Validation Review
During the on-site review, this issue will come up in the reviewer's interview with the medical director. He or she must be prepared to answer this question, as it is almost a certainty to come up. This kind of emergency suspension procedure is fairly uncommon, so it would not be surprising if you had no documented examples. However, if you do, we recommend that you be prepared to produce one or more examples of such an emergency suspension for the reviewer's examination.

  • Core 4.0 / 06.20.2018

    C-RM 1-2: Policy Addressing Reporting of Violations

    This standard requires your organization’s compliance policies to:Protect individuals reporting violations of ethical, regulatory, or legal requirements;Address the consequences of failing to report violations; andProtect the confidentiality of anyone reporting violations.

  • Core 4.0 / 06.18.2018

    C-RM 1-1: Regulatory Compliance and Internal Controls

    This standard, which bears a strong resemblance to Core 4 in the previous versions of Core, describes the fundamental aspects of an effective compliance program:Tracking applicable laws and regulations. This is an ongoing process of tracking existing laws and regulations and keeping up with changes in those laws and regulations. So, you need to identify -- in a clear and specific policy and proced...

  • Core 4.0 / 06.18.2018

    C-CPE 2-3: Monitoring and Oversight of Ethical Healthcare Practices

    Once an organization has defined ethical practices, as required by the previous standard, it must implement mechanisms to monitor for violations of its ethical standards and address those violations. Such mechanisms must spell out how it:Identifies appropriate authorities to remediate particular situations involving ethical transgressions;Will take action in the event of ethical issues; andWill re...